RFK Jr.’s Interesting Proposal to Hold Fauci Accountable

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just floated an interesting solution to hold Dr. Fauci accountable for his actions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

What is it? A truth commission.

 

The truth commission seems to be a way “around” the preemptive pardon given by Biden to Fauci, hours before leaving office. This pardon covers Fauci “potential” wrongdoing back to 2014. (But what if the COVID plans were going on before that?) And certainly, if that pardon was signed by the auto-pen, the pardon is most certainly null and void. But if the pardon holds, RFK Jr. seemed to insinuate that  “a truth commission” was still possible to hold Fauci’s feet to the fire, so to speak.

 

There is historical precedent for this, and the truth commission was a way to help those societies heal because they got to hear testimony on exactly what happened. If Fauci testified, he would have to tell the truth. The pardon means that he no longer has 5^th Amendment protection, so he would have to either tell the truth or commit perjury. “Taking the fifth” is no longer an option.

 

In a truth commission, anyone who testifies truthfully is given immunity from prosecution. People who choose not to testify or those who lie can be criminally prosecuted.

 

Some of these people – especially Fauci – have lied to us so much about COVID, even about the origins, that it may not even be possible for them to tell the truth. To this day, Fauci explains COVID-19 away as a natural occurrence, even despite his obtained emails that say otherwise. RFK Jr. is the best judge on how Fauci will perform under oath, since he wrote a whole book about The Real Anthony Fauci.

 

Fauci has already testified to Congress once, and many have said he perjured himself multiple times. One example: he claims it is inconceivable for the viruses he helped finance to have become COVID-19. Fauci is vulnerable here. Even if he is a pathological liar, having to rehash testimony will certainly mean that he will make mistakes.

 

Historical Precedent

A truth and reconciliation commission would be convened as an international body most likely. These groups are not courts, so they can’t prosecute, although the commissions do sometimes suggest justice and/or reparations. Specifically, groups like this are convened to investigate human rights violations or abuses. Their purpose is to establish an accurate historical record and acknowledge the victims’ suffering so that healing of the community can begin. They certainly recommend reforms to prevent future abuses from ever happening again. They are usually public in nature and aimed at moral accountability to society.

 

Perhaps the best historical example of a truth commission was the era of post-apartheid South Africa from 1996 to 2003 to investigate gross human rights violations. Canada used a truth commission (2008-2015) to address abuses in the Indian Residential School system. This was a cultural genocide of indigenous peoples. It certainly raised national awareness and led to public apologies, but was it enough? After all, this was GENOCIDE.

 

Explained psychologically, all the buzzwords are there: “deep listening” and “validation of those testifying” and “affirming testimony” and “social empathy.”

 

Where was the social empathy for the people who were locked in their homes, the children who couldn’t go to school, the business owners who lost everything when their shops were deemed non-essential, and the faith based communities who simply needed and wanted the solace found in their respective houses of worship?

 

This particular sentence bothered me: “It [truth commissions] is a way of “acknowledging their [victims] experiences as they remember them.”

 

As THEY remember it? I’m pretty sure a son or daughter remembers (ACCURATELY) his or her parent dying alone in the hospital after being put on a remdesivir or ventilator protocol. Then the article takes the inevitable snowflake turn: it “might be difficult to hear the stories.”

 

I think the people who lost their elderly parents who died in a nursing home – alone – because of social distancing (which Fauci later admitted was made up) had a bit harder time than listening to difficult stories. What about all the infants and children who died and are still dying suddenly? What about the athletes who dropped dead on fields of play from myocarditis? But, yeah, it might be difficult for us to sit and hear those stories. Give me a break!

 

When Truth Commissions Are Not Enough

A truth commission doesn’t seem good enough to right the wrongs of these victims, and there are millions of stories just like this around the world. Here’s an example of when truth and reconciliation wasn’t enough: the resolution of the Nazi atrocities after World War II.

 

If it had been, all the German-built museums in countries afflicted by Nazis would have been enough. But it wasn’t enough, and in the case of COVID, this doesn’t fit either. I don’t find it comforting to take a kid to a COVID museum and explain that doctors were too silent, stupid and corrupt during this time, so they killed your grandpa, and we’re gonna learn about it in the exhibits today, then go to the snack bar. It just really seems like a day trip to a museum doesn’t cut it. Am I right?

 

Instead, legal prosecutions against Nazis were pursued, as was denazification — a concerted effort to remove Nazi influence from public life, government, media and education.

 

The Allied Powers held the Nuremberg trials and criminally prosecuted top Nazi leaders for crimes against humanity. The trials focused on high-ranking officials who GAVE the orders and knew EXACTLY what was going on, every step of the way. The result? Death sentences and long prison terms. This is a good time to remind everyone that Fauci GAVE the orders, FUNDED the research and God only knows what else. There were also trials for lower ranking members as well. By the way, a US Supreme Court Justice served as America’s lead prosecutor. (Hello, Clarence Thomas!)

 

I don’t know about you, but this sounds more like it to me, and a greater option instead of the apology tour.

 

Given the scale and nature of the Nazi crimes, reconciliation simply wasn’t enough. The priority was punishment and justice. As they say, there was no need for a negotiated peace between the perpetrators and the victims because most Nazi leaders were captured or killed.

 

But we live in a different age, when people like Fauci are still free and haven’t been held accountable at all. Big Pharma is still cranking out new vaccines and buying companies to treat symptoms like turbo cancer and myocarditis – symptoms their own COVID-19 vaccines created.

 

We are in limbo, waiting and fighting for justice. And we’re tired. I realize Bobby Kennedy just floated the idea, but in this case, it’s just not enough. Time to go back to the drawing board and come out with a solution that more resembles Nuremburg. Back to the boards, Bobby! And this time, please get it right.

 

It took more than two decades for justice to come to Germany, and for the moral reckoning to happen. We need this badly right now. Even if it takes 20 years, we need to see some accountability.

 

The Nuremberg trials were the first-ever international military tribunal convened to try war crimes and crimes against humanity. It’s time for a second.