Merck’s NXT Rabies Vaccine: Shedding

Reprinted with permission from Dr. Will Falconer’s Vital Animal Substack

When I expressed my concerns about the newest rabies “vaccine” to enter the market, based on RNA tech, I was most concerned with safety studies being short and done “in house” as opposed to a year of following the vaccinated by an independent research group.

In case you missed the opening shot across the bow: here is that article from last summer.

That vaccine and another couple are now USDA approved (meaning: “Profitable! Cha ching!”), and it’s time to be on the lookout and inquire if your vet plans to use them.

Here are their names, at least in the US (they are also out in Canada):

-Nobivac NXT Feline‑1 Rabies

-Nobivac NXT Feline‑3 Rabies, and

-Nobivac NXT Canine‑1 Rabies

[Yes, as of now, USDA has not yet approved a Canine-3 Rabies, meaning a 3-year label. Probably still in the pipeline and I’d expect to see it. If it’s like other “3-year rabies vaccines,” you can put a solid bet on it being identical to the one-year version, just studied longer and so labeled.]

Besides rabies, the following are also out in circulation and actively being sold to pet owners:

–Nobivac NXT FeLV (Feline Leukemia Virus, which has never been a disease you could vaccinate away, it just indicates chronic disease is present, and upon getting your cat healthy, it quietly leaves).

–NXT Canine Flu H3N2 (another silly disease to even consider vaccinating against. No dog dies of the flu unless they are already seriously ill (remember “co-morbidities?” Yeah, that’s what we’re talking about here).

My second post laid out how to avoid these products, but in both, I was a bit hesitant to say a concern would be “shedding.” I didn’t feel we had enough data yet.

Shedding is Real

The data are now in, from what I consider a trustworthy source, A Midwestern Doctor, publishing on Substack:

The Forgotten Side of Medicine

What We Now Know About COVID Vaccine Shedding

The title itself should have you sitting up and paying attention, but as this author is often long-winded, I’ll abbreviate a bit so it’s easier to grasp.

By way of introduction, here’s some of the opening:

• After the COVID-19 vaccines hit the market, stories began emerging of unvaccinated individuals becoming ill after being in proximity to recently vaccinated individuals. This confused many, as the mRNA technology in theory should not be able to “shed.”
  
  

• After seeing countless patient cases which can only be explained by COVID vaccine shedding, a year ago, I initiated multiple widely seen calls for individuals to share suspected shedding experiences.
  
  

• From those 1,500 reports, clear and replicable patterns have emerged which collectively prove “shedding” is a real and predictable phenomenon that can be explained by known mechanisms unique to the mRNA technology.”

The effects of Covid jab shedding run the spectrum from bothersome to debilitating and affect not only super sensitive people but average ones as well.

Suspicions began when un-jabbed women started having abnormal menses after being near their vaccinated sisters.

I’ll let you read the good doctor’s findings, amassed over a few years’ time, with some others like Pierre Kory weighing in on their own clinical experiences.

The Nutshell Version

Some high points of the “how:”

The favored messenger is exosomes, little cell packets of RNA, protein, etc. that regularly bud off from cells.

These can move by air or direct contact to others.

This is entirely natural, and part of how we gain immunity, for example against the latest flu virus challenge “going around.”

Here’s where it gets concerning, however.

When tinkering takes place in the lab, especially at the level of genetic material, and mass-produced self-replicating RNA enters the picture without adequate safeguards, we get the possibility of negative consequences.

Hence, we see these people getting sick with Covid symptoms who’ve never had the disease or the injection.

So, Covid mRNA shedding is happening. Read some of the thousands of reports the good doctor used to come to this conclusion. They are eye opening.

And I’d expect this line of RNA products for pets to spread to others not vaccinated in a similar fashion as the Covid jabs did.

What to Take Away

As is common when profits drive production of meds or biologics, safeguards are often skirted and caution thrown to the wind.

To reiterate my earlier recommendation, I’d not allow these to be used in your animals. Ask to see a label if you choose to allow a vaccine.

And have that non-NXT vaccine pulled into a syringe in front of you before you let your pet be injected.

But dog flu? Or FeLV?

No way a vaccine of any kind for these diseases is in your animals’ best interest.

And get a homeopath on board as well as a raw diet if your cat is not well or your dog seems to be surviving but not thriving.

Then, you’ll start to see that glow that stops people in their tracks to exclaim, “OMG!! How did you get your pet looking this AMAZING?”